Weld Automation Tools and EquipmentSales For Sale

Complete range of welding tolls and equipment available for sale including positioners, manipulators, turning rolls and other weld automation products.

Induction Heating Systems

Checkout our wide range of induction heating systems (HIS) available for rent, lease and sale.

Power Generators

View our wide range of highly efficiency full line engine-driven generators including diesel, natural gas and hybrid bi-fuel generators.

Cutting Machine Sales and Service

We are a trusted dealer and distributer of all major cutting machines, like CNC plasma and oxyfuel cutting equipment, with over 20 years of experience in delivering, maintenance, repair and services.

DandD Power Oilfield

We are one of the top power generation rental and service providers in the southwest U.S. We have the capacity to keep your oilfield power generation equipment running.

Showing posts with label oxy fuel cutting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oxy fuel cutting. Show all posts

Friday, April 24, 2015

What’s a Good Choice-- Plasma Cutting or Oxy-fuel?

Steel service centers and fabricators looking towards purchasing a new machine often ask this question-- Plasma Cutting or Oxy-fuel? The other frequently posed question is: should a particular part be cut with plasma or oxy-fuel? The confusion is limited to those working with mild steel as oxy-fuel fails to cut an aluminum or stainless plate; and the answer to the debate depends on various factors-- thickness, location, alloy, variety of work, cost, power resources, etc.

Comparing Plasma vs. Oxy-fuel -- Cutting Speed

Based singularly on cutting speed, plasma serves to be faster than an oxy-fuel torch, to an extent of 2.75 inches. The act of using two oxy-fuel torches makes the speed drop back to a thickness of 2 inches. In the comparison of a single plasma torch versus 4 oxy-fuel torches, oxy-fuel wins when it is at 1-1/8 inch and thicker. This shows that:
  • A one inch cut-off with respect to plasma holds true if the parts are being cut with at least 4 different oxy-fuel torches at the same time;
  • Plasma ranks higher on speed on anything that’s less than 3/4 inch thick, also with 4 oxy-fuel torches versus 260 Amps.

Comparison of Oxy-Fuel and Plasma-- Cost-Per-Inch

After taking all the costs associated with the two processes:
  • Plasma: nozzles, shields, retainers, electrodes, baffles, oxygen, electricity, compressed air and torch coolant;
  • Oxy-fuel: fuel gas, internal/external nozzles, and oxygen;

studies have shown that an oxy-fuel torch proves less expensive (per inch) than 450 Amp plasma; this is true for anything that’s above 2-5/8 inch of thickness. Cutting with 4 oxy-fuel torches is far less expensive (per inch) until a thickness of 3/4 inch.

Comparing Oxy-Fuel vs. Plasma--Cost-per-Part

When different part-sizes (with varying numbers of pierces) were considered for cost-per-hour of overhead and labor, the cross-over point of a 450Amp plasma vs. an oxy-fuel torch was found to be just a little less than 3” thick. However, if the plasma speed was doubled, the results were different. 

Conclusion

For deciding whether a part should use a burning machine or a plasma cutter:
  • Use plasma for all instances that have a production piercing capacity of 2 inches thickness.
  • Use oxy-fuel for  those materials that can be chain cut or are more than 1 inch thick (with 1 or 2 pierces), and are capable of being cut with a minimum of 4 oxy-fuel torches. Else, use plasma.

Hope this helps you find answers to the age old question. Do post your logic or comments speaking of your own experiences.

Share:

Labels